Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2022 Feb; 70(2): 523-528
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-224134

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the biomechanical properties of the eye bank?prepared and surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) tissues. Methods: In this laboratory study, corneal tissues for research were randomly allocated in the following groups: a) surgeon?cut DSAEK and b) eye bank?prepared (pre?cut and pre?loaded) DSAEK. Endothelial cell loss (ECL), immunostaining for tight junction protein ZO?1, elastic modulus, and adhesion force were investigated. Results: ECL was not found to be significantly different between surgeon?cut DSAEK (7.8% ±6.5%), pre?cut DSAEK (8.6% ±2.3%), and pre?loaded DSAEK (11.1% ±4.8%) (P = 0.5910). ZO?1 was expressed equally across all groups. Surgeon?cut DSAEK grafts showed a significantly higher elastic modulus compared to pre?cut and pre?loaded DSAEK groups (P = 0.0047 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Adhesion force was significantly greater in the surgeon?cut DSAEK compared to pre?cut (P < 0.0001) or pre?loaded DSAEK groups (P = 0.0101). Conclusion: The laboratory data on the biomechanics of DSAEK grafts suggests that surgeon?cut DSAEK grafts present higher elastic modulus and adhesion force compared to eye bank?prepared DSAEK grafts.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL